SC-300 Certification Practice Question #268

Question

You have a Microsoft Entra tenant that contains the identities shown in the following table.

Group1 has the following configurations:

•	Owners: User1, User4
•	Members: User1, Managed2, Group2

You create an access review that has the following settings:

•	Name: Review1
•	Review scope: Select Teams + Groups
•	Group: Group1
•	Scope: All users
•	Select reviewers: Group owner(s)

The Fallback reviewers setting is NOT configured.

For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is true. Otherwise, select No.

NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

Accepted Answer

Row 2 and Row 3 are well-grounded: Managed2 is a direct member so the owner-reviewer can review it (Yes), and MS Learn explicitly states nested groups are *flattened* into individual users in a group review, so User3 (member of nested Group2) appears in scope (Yes) — this overturns Oskarma's NYN claim that nested members are excluded. Row 1 (self-review) is the genuinely contested point: the largest single vote (Oskarma, 👍 8) and four corroborating reasoned comments treat the group-owner reviewer as unable to review their own access (No), while a couple of low-vote testers (raduM, Lucidica) report being able to self-review (Yes). The reasoned majority plus the principle that reviewers should not approve their own access favor **No** for Row 1, giving **N-Y-Y**. Confidence is held at 80% because MS Learn doesn't give a single quotable rule on owner self-review and the community is split on Row 1.

More SC-300 practice questions