Question 17
CCA-F is a newly released exam. These practice questions reflect our best current understanding — the exact wording and question formats may change in the live exam until the certification matures. Use them to learn the concepts, not to memorize.
Scenario: Claude Code for Continuous Integration - Your team uses Claude Code for generating code suggestions, but you notice a pattern: non-obvious issues—performance optimizations that break edge cases, cleanups that unexpectedly change behavior—are only caught when another team member reviews the PR. Claude’s reasoning during generation shows it considered these cases but concluded its approach was correct. Which approach directly addresses the root cause of this self-check limitation? Which approach directly addresses the root cause?
- ARun a second independent instance of Claude Code to review the changes without access to the generator’s reasoning.
- BEnable extended thinking mode for the generation stage to allow more thorough deliberation before producing suggestions.
- CAdd explicit self-review instructions to the generation prompt asking Claude to critique its own suggestions before finalizing output.
- DInclude full test files and documentation in prompt context so Claude better understands expected behavior during generation.