Question 25
CCA-F is a newly released exam. These practice questions reflect our best current understanding — the exact wording and question formats may change in the live exam until the certification matures. Use them to learn the concepts, not to memorize.
Scenario: Claude Code for Continuous Integration - After an initial automated review identifies 12 findings, a developer pushes new commits to address issues. Re-running review produces 8 findings, but developers report that 5 duplicate previous comments on code that was already fixed in the new commits. What is the most effective way to eliminate this redundant feedback while maintaining thoroughness? What is the most effective way to eliminate redundant feedback?
- ARun review only when the PR is created and in the final pre-merge state, skipping intermediate commits.
- BAdd a post-processing filter that removes findings that match previous ones by file paths and issue descriptions before posting comments.
- CRestrict review scope to files changed in the most recent push, excluding files from earlier commits.
- DInclude previous review findings in context and instruct Claude to report only new or still-unresolved issues.