Question 28
CCA-F is a newly released exam. These practice questions reflect our best current understanding — the exact wording and question formats may change in the live exam until the certification matures. Use them to learn the concepts, not to memorize.
Scenario: Claude Code for Continuous Integration - Your automated code review averages 15 findings per pull request, and developers report a 40% false-positive rate. The bottleneck is investigation time: developers must click into each finding to read Claude’s rationale before deciding whether to fix or dismiss it. Your CLAUDE.md already contains comprehensive rules for acceptable patterns, and stakeholders rejected any approach that filters findings before developers see them. What change best addresses investigation time? What change best addresses investigation time?
- ARequire Claude to include its rationale and confidence estimate directly in each finding.
- BAdd a post-processor that analyzes finding patterns and automatically suppresses those that match historical false-positive signatures.
- CCategorize findings as “blocking issues” vs “suggestions,” with different review requirements by level.
- DConfigure Claude to show only high-confidence findings, filtering uncertain flags before developers see them.